Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gerald P. VanPatten v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 2013No. 02S03-1205-CR-251Published

1ConcurrenceMassa, Justice

Although I agree with the majority’s analysis of S.D.’s statements to Moss under our Rules of Evidence, I write separately because I believe the admissibility of such evidence can and should be evaluated pursuant to the Protected Person Statute, Indiana Code § 35-37-4-6 (2008 & Supp.2012), not Rule 803(4). Child victim hearsay presents a unique evidentiary problem in prosecutions for abuse and molestation. In cases where the child is unavailable to testify, these statements are frequently the strongest evidence of a defendant’s guilt. Deborah Paruch, Silencing the Victims in Child Sexual…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Holland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Harrison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Glendening v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. SorensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Hall v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API