Legal Opinion
Bonanza v. Raj
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 7, 2001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the fol*949lowing Memorandum: Plaintiffs decedent was treated for dyspepsia and reflux esophagitis by Joseph I. Raj, M.D. (defendant) on several occasions over a two-year period. Plaintiff commenced this medical malpractice action alleging that defendant failed to diagnose decedent with gastric adenocarcinoma. Supreme Court erred in granting defendants’ cross motion seeking summary judgment dismissing the complaint with respect to claims based on medical services provided by defendant prior to January…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hill v. Manhattan West Medical Group—H.I.P., P. C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Green v. VarnumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by6 opinions
- Simons v. Bassett Health CareAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Hein v. Cornwall HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Davidson v. O'BrienAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Adams v. BackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Hilts v. FF Thompson Health System, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.