Legal Opinion

Alexandria Bank & Trust Co. v. Honeycutt

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 29, 1926No. 27457PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

The defendants J. W. Honeycutt and W. R. O’Neal indorsed a note of Canal Land & Live Stock Company, for $5,-000, interest, and attorneys’ fees in case of suit. The note was not paid, and there was judgment below against the indorsers for the full amount, subject, however, to a credit of $1,250, from which judgment Honeycutt alone appeals.

At the time the note was indorsed by the defendants, it was secured by pledge of 10 shares of the Home Investment Company, 20 shares of the Day Builders Supply Company, and sundry other shares of stock of no value —all of which belonged to the said W. R.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. DaviesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  2. Barrow v. ShieldsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  3. Provan v. PercySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  4. Gosserand v. LacourSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1853
  5. Succession of PrattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1861

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bonura v. Christiana Bros. Poultry Co. of Gretna, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
  2. American Bank & Trust Company v. StraughanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
  3. Paulausky v. Polish Roman Catholic UnionIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Woods v. SpannSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  5. Pontchartrain Apartments, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API