Legal Opinion · Dissent

Igartua v. Trump

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided August 9, 2017No. 15-1336OUnknown

1DissentThompson, Circuit Judge

Bravo to Judges Torruella and Lipez for showing us just how wrong the decision not to hear this case en banc really is. Allow me to add my words of protest too.

Plaintiffs’ en-banc request turns on whether a district judge should’ve convened a three-judge court to decide a question of transcendent importance — do U.S. citizens/residents in Puerto Rico have a constitutional right to vote in certain federal elections? The problem here is that an earlier decision of this court — one that only an en-banc court can reverse — held that a three-judge court isn’t required to hear a claim like…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bonas v. Town of North SmithfieldCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Igartúa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Igartúa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. Igartúa v. ObamaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API