Legal Opinion

Hillis v. Addle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 3, 1912No. 2118PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court. Creek County; W. L. Barnum, Judge. Action by J. M. Addle against J. M. Hillis. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

This action was begun in the mayor’s court of the incorporated town of Bristow, Ind. T., on the 28th day of October, 1907, by defendant in error to recover from plaintiff in error a sum of money evidenced by a duebill. The trial occurred in that court on the '15th day of November, 1907, just one day prior to statehood, and resulted in a judgment for plaintiff in error, defendant in the mayor’s court. On the 2d day of December following, subsequent to the admission of the state, defendant in error, plaintiff in the mayor’s court, filed his affidavit for appeal with the mayor of the town of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Welch v. BarnettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Moberly v. RothSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Parks v. City of AdaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Edwards v. JewellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hooper v. City of Tulsa, TheDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  2. Patterson v. RousneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API