Legal Opinion
Gause v. Detroit Trust Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 17, 1936No. 396PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Michigan.
2Per curiam
The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Bell Tele*696phone Co. v. Van Dyke, 296 U. S. 533; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 162, 165; Hale v. Lewis, 181 U. S. 473, 479, 480; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 368, 370.
Messrs. Henry B. Graves and Mark L. Rowley for appellant. Mr. Jason L. Honigman, with whom Messrs. Alex J. Groesbeck and A. W. Sempliner were on…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Eustis v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Hale v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Bell Telephone Co. v. Van DykeSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
4Cited by24 opinions
- Kuhn v. Princess Lida of Thurn & TaxisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
- State v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- People v. PottsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. BirminghamMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Suhr v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.