Legal Opinion
Brugnano v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 6, 1995PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Huff, J.), entered November 7, 1994, which granted both a motion and cross-motion to dismiss the complaint and the related additional-party pleadings and denied plaintiffs’ motion for leave to amend their bill of particulars, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
*19Since plaintiff employee was employed to clear away the very debris that posed a hazard in the work place, the IAS Court properly dismissed the complaint (Kowalsky v Conreco Co., 264 NY 125). Defendants could not have provided plaintiff with a work place that was safe from the defect that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kowalsky v. Conreco CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Lawyer v. Rotterdam Ventures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Senkbeil v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- Spielberger v. GiambalvoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
3Cited by6 opinions
- Jackson v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Hansen v. Trustees of the Methodist Episcopal Church of Glen CoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Lopez v. Fordham UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Henriquez v. New 520 Gsh LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Rosciano v. Royal Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.