Legal Opinion

Philips v. Munchery Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 1, 2021No. 3:19-cv-00469Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 JOSHUA JAMES EATON PHILIPS, et al., Case No. 19-cv-00469-JSC 9 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 10 v. ACTION SETTLEMENT, MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, COSTS, 11 MUNCHERY INC., AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE AWARD Defendant. 12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 65 13 14 Plaintiffs Joshua James Eaton Phillips and Christina Brooks bring this putative class action 15 under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (“WARN Act”),

29 U.S.C. § 16

2101(a)(2), and its California state law counterpart,…

2Cases cited21 opinions

Staton v. Boeing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
In Re Bluetooth Headset Products LiabilityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
Rodriguez v. West Publishing Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
Martin Gonzalez, Sr. v. City of MaywoodCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.