Dyas & Co. v. Dinkgrave
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the District Court of the Parish Ouachita, Richardson, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLaud, J.
The defendants are sued on two promissory notes : one for §1473 32, and the other for §853 12, and both dated at the same place, and on the same day, and both payable to Dyas & Co., of New Orleans, and both payable twelve months after date.
The defendants filed an exception to the suit, on the ground that two actions have been cumulated contrary to law, in this, to wit: that the firm of Dyas & Co. was composed of different persons, when the indebtedness was created which forms the consideration of the first note for §1473 32, from those persons who composed said firm when the indebtedness was…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Gill v. City of Lake CharlesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
- McGee v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Gravenberg v. LawsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1900
- Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co. v. Godchaux Sugars, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
- Ortiz v. Comisión de la Policía InsularSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.