Young v. Reynolds
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Chancery. This case is connected with the preceding, and is an appeal taken by the heirs at law of Thomas Mackall from the decree of the chancellor, overruling their exceptions to claim No. 1 against the estate of said Thomas, and allowing the same. The exceptions were that the claim was not fully proved and was barred by limitations. All the material facts of the case relating to this claim are stated in the opinion of this court, and also in 3 Md.
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Chancery. This case is connected with the preceding, and is an appeal taken by the heirs at law of Thomas Mackall from the decree of the chancellor, overruling their exceptions to claim No. 1 against the estate of said Thomas, and allowing the same. The exceptions were that the claim was not fully proved and was barred by limitations. All the material facts of the case relating to this claim are stated in the opinion of this court, and also in 3 Md. Ch. Decisions, 398, where the opinion of’ the chancellor is reported.
1Opinion of the Court
Le Grand, C. J.,
delivered (he opinion of this court.
The appellants, on the 28th day of May 1847, filed their bill in the court of chancery against Anne R. G. Mackall and Louis Mackall, Jr., alleging, that they and the defendants in that proceeding were the heirs at law of Thomas Mackall, deceased, and as such, seized of real estate lying in Calvert county. They aver it to be incapable of beneficial division amongst the parties, and pray a decree for its sale, and that the proceeds may be distributed according to the rights of parties. Before the answers were filed, or decree passed, Edward…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Emery v. OwingsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
3Cited by2 opinions
- Huston v. DittoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1863
- Laine v. FrancisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884