Legal Opinion

United States v. Ord

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided July 3, 2006No. 05-0651/ARPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

At a general court-martial composed of a military judge sitting alone, Appellant was convicted, pursuant to his pleas, of desertion, larceny (five specifications), and forgery, in violation of Articles 85,121, and 123, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 885, 921, 923 (2000). He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for twenty-seven months, and reduction to the grade of E-l.

The staff judge advocate (SJA) provided the convening authority with a post-trial recommendation under Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 1106. Although Appellant had been convicted of seven…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. DiazUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. Alexander & U.S. v. VanderschaafCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. StromerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API