Legal Opinion

Faulkner v. Thorn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1938No. 8795PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hatgher, Judge:

This is a suit to establish an easement, the use of which defendant was impeding. The circuit court dismissed the bill and in response to the answer; established a division line between the parties. In passing, it is noted that equity has no independent jurisdiction to establish a boundary line and could do so in this cause only as an incident to the determination of the alleged easement. Carberry v. Rr. Co., 44 W. Va. 260, 28 S. E. 694; 9 C. J., subject Boundaries, sec. 281.

Plaintiff’s farm is rectangular and is adjoined on its entire southern line by defendant’s farm. Along…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carberry v. West Virginia & P. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Warren v. BoggsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Dean v. GivenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blain v. WoodsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. West Virginia Pulp & Paper Co. v. J. Natwick & Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Faulkner v. ThornWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API