Natural Gas Clearinghouse v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, United Municipal Distributors Group, Intervenors
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge WILLIAMS.
STEPHEN F. WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge:
Moving natural gas through a pipeline requires energy, which is commonly, perhaps invariably, supplied by natural gas itself. Koch Gateway Pipeline Company has customarily used its shippers’ own gas for these purposes, simply providing a little less gas (about two percent less) at the point of delivery than the shipper supplied at the point of receipt. In 1995 Koch filed tariff sheets under which it would give shippers an additional option — that of paying Koch in cash for the requisite fuel, at a price…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3Cited by10 opinions
- Wisconsin Public Power Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2007
- Sierra Club v. Van AntwerpCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Texaco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Southeastern Michigan Gas Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.