Morgan v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
In this postconviction relief proceeding, we must decide whether we should apply a recent United States Supreme Court decision retroactively to the applicant’s conviction. We must also decide whether the applicant’s appellate counsel rendered ineffective assistance. That claim is based on counsel’s failure to prolong the applicant’s case so the applicant could assert retroactive application of the decision. The district court denied the applicant relief on both issues. We affirm.
I. Background Facts and Proceedings.
In November 1986 Hosea Morgan, the postconviction relief…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Phuoc Nguyen v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
- Sergio Perez v. State of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- State v. WissingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.