Legal Opinion

People v. Wheeler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 21, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment *950unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied effective assistance of counsel (see, People v Flores, 84 NY2d 184, 189). County Court’s Sandoval compromise reflects a proper exercise of the court’s discretion (see, People v Walker, 83 NY2d 455, 458-459; People v Davis, 168 AD2d 218, lv denied 77 NY2d 876). The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), is legally sufficient to support the conviction. Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that prosecutorial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. People v. FloresNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. People v. BallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  3. People v. WitzigmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API