Legal Opinion

Salomon v. Cawston Ostrich Farm

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1919No. Civ. No. 3043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBrittain, J.

The plaintiff and appellant sued the defendant as a guarantor of a lease made and performable in New York. The trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff for $2,197.48, the unpaid portion of rent for the month of October, 1914, with certain surcharges. The appellant maintains the judgment should have been for $6,045.36, to include the difference between the rental specified in the lease and that received between November 1, 1914, and April 1, 1915.

The appellant leased to the respondent, a California corporation, for five years, the most northerly store and basement thereunder, on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCready v. . LindenbornNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  2. Page v. . KrekeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Ranger v. BaconNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
  4. Wallace v. DinninyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Hackett v. . RichardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1855

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Cawston Ostrich Farm v. SalomonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API