Legal Opinion
Mattson v. St. Paul Title Co. of the South
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided November 1, 1982No. 82-98Published
1Opinion of the Court
641 S.W.2d 16 (1982)
277 Ark. 290
Dorothy MATTSON, Appellant,
v.
ST. PAUL TITLE COMPANY OF THE SOUTH, Appellee.
No. 82-98.
Supreme Court of Arkansas.
November 1, 1982.
Herrod & Vess by E.H. "Buz" Herrod, North Little Rock, for appellant.
Plegge & Church by Beresford L. Church, Jr., Little Rock, for appellee.
DUDLEY, Justice.
The issue in this case is whether a title insurance company has a contractual duty to defend the insured against a complaint alleging that the insured acquired title by exercising fraud and undue influence. The trial court found no duty to defend. The Court of Appeals certified the…
Also in this document: Dissent · Purtle; Dissent · Purtle.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. of America v. HenshallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Mattson v. St. Paul Title Co. of the SouthSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1982
- Proctor Seed & Feed Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- Brick Realty Corp. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1936
- Rosenblatt v. Louisville Title CompanyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.