Oliver v. Oliver

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in awarding defendant an equitable share of plaintiffs residential property, purchased eight years after the parties separated but before plaintiff commenced this action for divorce. Defendant never lived in the home, nor did she contribute any funds or housekeeping services (see, Gross v Gross, 160 AD2d 976, 978). The court improperly took into consideration child support arrears cancelled by Family Court 10 years before plaintiff purchased the…