Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 30, 1995No. CA CR 94-687PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant was convicted of two counts of aggravated assault and sentenced to six years imprisonment. He appealed. The Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal because no effective notice of appeal was filed. Smith v. State, 49 Ark. App. 73, 896 S.W.2d 450 (1995). Appellant’s attorney subsequently filed a motion styled “Motion For A Belated Appeal” and has stated it was his error that resulted in the failure to give an effective notice of appeal. He asks that, because of his error, we grant a belated appeal.

Under authority of Ark. R. Crim. P. Rule 36.9, we grant belated appeals because of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pannell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  2. Krein v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harris v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API