Legal Opinion

State v. . Brown

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1926PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

At common law the party injured by a nuisance had a choice of two remedies. (1) He could bring an action on the case for damages, and, if a tenant of the freehold, he could resort to the assize of nuisance or to the writ of quod permittat prosternere, which not only gave the plaintiff satisfaction for his injury, but removed the cause by abating the nuisance. These writs, long out of use, have been super-' seded for practical purposes, in the absence of special statutory provision, by an action for damages and abatement and by a suit in equity to restrain the continuance of the wrong. (2) The…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . ParrottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  2. Wolfe v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pernell v. City of HendersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API