Legal Opinion

State v. Rutledge

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 4, 1992No. 90-02256Published

1Per curiam

The State of Florida challenges the trial court’s final order granting the appellees’, Gwendolyn Rutledge and Donald Crosley, motion to dismiss a RICO charge and a conspiracy charge. We affirm the dismissal of the RICO charge but reverse the dismissal of the conspiracy charge.

The appellee Crosley filed a cross-appeal challenging the denial of his motions to sever defendants and offenses and challenging the denial of his motion to dismiss the trafficking in cocaine charge. We find no merit to the points raised in the cross-appeal and affirm the denial of cross-appellant’s motions.

The state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Boyd v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. State v. PentecostDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  3. Jimenez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Filer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  5. State v. AndersonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API