Legal Opinion
Flores v. State
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided March 22, 1968No. 116PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SPIES S, Chief Judge.
Narciso Flores appeals from the denial of his motion for post conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 93, § 21-1-1(93), N.M.S. A. 1953.
Appellant was tried and convicted of armed robbery by a jury of Dona Ana County with the Honorable Edward E. Triviz, District Judge, presiding. Defendant was sentenced to serve a term in the state penitentiary. By his pro se Rule 93 motion defendant asserts that he was deprived of his liberty without due process of law contrary to the constitutions of the United States and State of New Mexico and was denied a fair and impartial…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. ChavezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. GilbertNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- The People v. WosIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
- Brem v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1965
- Tharp v. MassengillNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lujan v. City of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
- State v. TrujilloNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joseph Kachinski v. A. C. Cavell, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution, at RockviewCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
- Flores v. StateNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
- Lujan v. City of Santa FeDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.