Legal Opinion

Valera v. Reading Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 23, 1943No. Appeals, 174 and 175PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Maxey,

The plaintiffs, LaAvrence Morata and Lawrence Valera, brought separate actions against the defendant, the Reading Company, on account of injuries sustained in an accident at a grade crossing. In the Valera case the defendant brought in Morata as an additional defendant. State highway route No. 54 in Northumberland County, intersects the Reading’s railroad single track at Richard’s Tunnel Crossing. On the night of November 14, 1941, an automobile driven by Morata, with Valera as a guest passenger, was struck at this crossing by the defendant’s train. Both…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rodgers Et Ux. v. SaxtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  3. Grimes v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Hawk v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  5. Kolich v. Monongahela Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank v. Philadelphia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Riesberg v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. McElhinny v. IliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Cattie v. Joseph P. Cattie & Bros.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Kocher v. Creston Transfer Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API