Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Price
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
HOLT, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order vacating a judgment entered on default and permitting defendant to interpose a proposed answer.
Vacating a default judgment is largely discretionary; but if it appears that the proposed answer states no defense, it is an abuse of judicial discretion to vacate the judgment. We therefore go directly to the merits of the proposed answer. The complaint alleged that plaintiffs’ grantors, as lessors, by written lease, let the second floor of a two-story brick building known as No. 25 South Fifth street in Minneapolis, Minnesota, for the term of ten years…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Defiel v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- O'Neil v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Bell v. BakerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890