Legal Opinion
Rubright v. City of Pittsburgh
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided February 8, 1892No. Appeal, No. 49PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal, No. 49, Oct. T., 1892, by plaintiff, from decree of C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., March T., 1892, No. 263, dismissing a bill in equity. Bill in equity by Noah Rubright against the city of Pittsburgh. The facts were similar to those in Donley v. Pittsburgh, supra.
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The only question raised in this case is the constitutionality of the act of May 16, 1891, commonly known as the “ New Street Act.” This matter was considered and decided in Donley’s Appeal, and need not be further discussed.
The decree is affirmed and the appeal dismissed at the costs of the appellant.
2Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. 2109 Brandywine, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Chamberlain v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
- Zalis v. OrmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Silver Spring Title Co. v. ChadwickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- Land v. ReeseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926