Strohmaier v. Zeppenfeld
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: 4 Kent’s Com., sec. 109 ; Underwood v. Underwood, 48 Mo. 527 ; Hug v. Van Burkleo, 58 Mo. 202; Biddle v. Ramsey, 52 Mo.; Story’s Eq. Jur., sec. 1457. cited : Arnot v. Alexander, 44 Mo. 25 ; Hall v. Warren, 9 Ves. 605 ; Finney v. Cist, 34 Mo. 303.
1Opinion of the CourtHayden, J.
This is a bill in the nature of a bill in equity, asking that the defendant may be compelled to execute a renewal of a lease. A former owner of the leased lot had leased it to the respondent for a term of ten years, and in the lease was the following covenant: “ And it is covenanted and agreed by and between the said parties that, at the end of the term hereby demised, this lease shall be renewable for the further *430term of ten years, provided that the party of the second part giving [give] to the party of the first pai’t notice in writing of his or their wish to renew the same, three months at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnot v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1869
- Biddle v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Kelso v. KellyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1860
- Hug v. Van BurkleoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
- Dunnell v. KeteltasNew York Supreme Court · 1863
3Cited by7 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1879
- Diffenderfer v. Board of President of St. Louis Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Tureman v. AltmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Glenn v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Biddle v. McDonoughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.