Legal Opinion

Griggs v. Gower

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1902No. 4182PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Pierce County. — Hon. Thau Huston, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court! was delivered hy

Mount, J.

On October 30, 1888, appellant, hy written contract, agreed to convey to respondents an undivided *88one-half interest in the southeast quarter of the northeast quarter of section J, township 20 north, range 3 east, in consideration of the payment of $14,000, $1,000 of which was then paid. Thereafter, on January 20, 1889, appellant conveyed by deed the whole of the above-described premises to respondents, and on the same day entered into a written contract with respondents,' which recited, among other things, as follows:

“Whereas, a certain suit…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. SwaseyWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Cannon Hill Co. v. MooreWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Washington Pulp & Paper Corp. v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API