Legal Opinion

Denison v. Brotherhood of American Yeomen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 16, 1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Polh District Court. — Lawrence De Graee, Judge. Aotion in equity to enjoin tbe defendants from interfering with the plaintiff’s possession of the office of general attorney of the Brotherhood of American Yeomen. A temporary injunction was granted, which, on motion of the defendants, was dissolved. Plaintiff appeals from the order dissolving the temporary injunction. —

1Opinion of the CourtFaville, J.

i injunction-interference with, de facto officer. I. The appellant’s petition alleges that the appellee Brotherhood of American Yeomen is a fraternal beneficiary association, duly organized under the laws of the state °£ I°wa; that the other appellees are the board 0f directors and other officers of said association; that the appellant is the general attorney of the said association, and was appointed as such in the month of June, 1917, by the board of directors; and that he qualified and entered upon the duties of said office. The petition sets out the following by-laws of the association:

“Se…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  2. People v. . Albany Susquehanna R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Cochran v. McClearySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  4. Guillotte v. PoincySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1889
  5. State ex rel. Perine v. Van BeekSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sutton v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  2. Dayton v. BechlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API