Legal Opinion

Gilmore v. Continental Insurance

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 12, 1935No. 24068PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSutton, J.

The defendant owned a mill and dwelling house and the dwelling was insured with the plaintiff. There was a fire, wliich destroyed both the mill and the residence. The fire was alleged to have been caused by the negligence of a third person. The insurer paid the loss on the dwelling house and took from the insured an assignment of his claim or right of action against the third person, wherein the insurer became subrogated to all the rights of the insured against the tort-feasor. Thereafter the insured settled with the tort-feasor, as he claims, for damages to his person and to his mill…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Beall v. Mineral Tone Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  2. Bosworth v. NelsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  3. Hightower v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  4. Rodgers v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  5. Sheftall v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clark v. Calhoun National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Jones v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Jobson v. CaldwellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API