Maggart v. Wakefield
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Canadian County; John J. Carney, Judge. Action between William H. Maggart and Ruella Jeanette Wakefield and Frank A. Wakefield. From the judgment, Mag-gart brings error.-
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
The record shows that no exception was taken to the order of the court overruling the motion for a new trial. Originally the only errors assigned were such as would require a motion for a new trial to review. After the cause had been pending in this court for about a year, and long after the time' for taking an appeal had expired, plaintiff in error asked leave to amend his petition in error; and, upon leave being granted, the petition in error was amended by assigning as error the in sufficiency of the petition to support the verdict rendered. Pric' to this amendment, there was no error…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bellamy v. Washita Valley Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Haynes v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Alexander v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Vaughn Lumber Co. v. Missouri Mining & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Palmer-Gregory Chiropractic College v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Missouri, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. McClellanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co. v. WinsleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913