Legal Opinion

Judge v. Arlen

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 9, 1887Published

Appeal from Clinton Circuit Court. Action in equity. The relief asked was denied, and the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.

1. Nuisance: intoxicating liquors: abatement: vested rights: removal of causes to federal courts. The petitions in the above-named cases are substantially alike, and state that the defendants are engaged seEing: keeping and maintaining a place for the sale of intoxicating liquors, thereby creating a nuisance; and the relief asked is that the nuisanee be enjoined and abated. The defendants severally answered the petitions, denied the allegations thereof, and asked that the causes be removed to the federal court upon the ground that a federal question was involved. A proper, and sufficient…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLane v. LeichtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API