Insurance Co. of North America v. Dimaio
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1ConcurrenceEberhardt, Judge
I am in agreement with the majority opinion. However, there are some observations that I feel it proper to make.
I agree that when a statute provides that an official performing a judicial or a quasi-judicial function may exercise a discretion, there is a correlative duty upon him to do so when he is confronted with a motion or other situation involving an exercise of discretion. See cases cited in American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 120 Ga. App. 203. I agree, too, that the failure or refusal of such an officer to rule on a matter properly presented for the invoking of a ruling is tantamount *217…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- South View Cemetery Association v. HaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Rourke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
- Marshall v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Milton v. Mitchell County Electric Membership Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.