Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Insurance Co. of North America v. Dimaio

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1969No. 44257Published

1ConcurrenceEberhardt, Judge

I am in agreement with the majority opinion. However, there are some observations that I feel it proper to make.

I agree that when a statute provides that an official performing a judicial or a quasi-judicial function may exercise a discretion, there is a correlative duty upon him to do so when he is confronted with a motion or other situation involving an exercise of discretion. See cases cited in American Liberty Ins. Co. v. Sanders, 120 Ga. App. 203. I agree, too, that the failure or refusal of such an officer to rule on a matter properly presented for the invoking of a ruling is tantamount *217…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. South View Cemetery Association v. HaileySupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  2. Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Rourke v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Marshall v. RussellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Milton v. Mitchell County Electric Membership Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API