Legal Opinion

Zabriskie v. Wilder

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion to set aside an amended return upon appeal from a district court in the city of New York. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoessen, J.

In Wait’s Practice (vol. 4 p. 449) will be found a form for an additional return voluntarily made by a justice. There is no doubt that this court may, of its own motion, order an amended or a supplemental return, nor is there any doubt that a justice of a district court may himself apply for leave to amend or to supplement his return (Simpson v. Carter, 5 Johns. 350). There is more question as to whether or not a justice may, without obtaining permission of the appellate court, volunteer to make an amended or a supplemental return.

In Barker v. Webster the General Term of the Superior Court of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rudd v. BakerNew York Supreme Court · 1811
  2. Simpson v. CarterNew York Supreme Court · 1810

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Haight v. PotterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  2. Thomas v. WhitleggeNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API