Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1922No. Criminal No. 521PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the County of Maricopa. E. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtRoss, C. J.

Appellant was tried and convicted in the city court of the city of Phoenix, upon a charge of violating a city ordinance against selling or attempting to sell intoxicating liquor within the city. He appealed to the superior court, where the case was tried _de novó and was again convicted. Prom the judgment of conviction, he appeals.

The only errors assigned are the insufficiency of the complaint to state a crime, and a refusal to postpone the trial upon a showing of the absence of material witnesses. These are questions we have no power to pass on in a case appealed from “a justice, police, or…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. SpitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
  2. State v. GuthrieArizona Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API