Legal Opinion

State v. Pittman

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 14, 2010No. AC 30429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MIHALAKOS, J.

The defendant, Boyd Pittman, appeals from the judgment of the trial court revoking his probation and sentencing him to thirty-nine months imprisonment. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly denied his motion to dismiss because the state failed to execute the arrest warrant for violation of probation with reasonable diligence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

We begin by noting the standard that this court applies in reviewing a trial court’s ruling on a motion to dismiss. “A motion to dismiss . . . properly attacks the jurisdiction of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. FigueroaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Parham v. Warden, Bridgeport Community Correctional CenterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  4. State v. SoldiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  5. State v. RuscoeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Holkesvig v. WelteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. CrosbyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
  3. State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
  4. State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. PittmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API