Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 24-80, (1980)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided April 9, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOSEPH N. NOLL, Secretary Department of Industry, Labor andHuman Relations

You have asked whether sec. 103.37, Stats., applies to the state, its political subdivisions or counties. It is my opinion that it does not apply to these governmental units.

Section 103.37, Stats., provides as follows:(1) It shall be unlawful for any employer, as defined in subsection (2) to require any employe or applicant for employment to pay the cost of a medical examination required by the employer as a condition of employment.(2) "Employer", as used in this section means an individual, a partnership, an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Bender v. Jamaica HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. City of Madison v. Hyland, Hall & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. CanovaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  5. City of Kenosha v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Opinion No. Oag 72-80, (1980), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1980
  2. Opinion No. Oag 47-87, (1987), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API