Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Booker, Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 23, 1997No. 96-2994, 96-3142PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted Robert Booker of operating a crack distribution house, and of possessing crack cocaine with intent to distribute that substance, but acquitted him of using a gun during these crimes in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). At sentencing, the prosecutor asked the district judge to add two offense levels under U.S.S.G. § 2Dl.l(b)(l), on the ground that Booker possessed a firearm. The judge refused, giving the jury’s acquittal on the § 924(c) charge as his only reason.

We reversed and remanded for resentenc-ing. United States v. Pollard, 72 F.3d 66, 68-69 (7th Cir.1995). Our opinion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. United States v. Michael L. Carmack, Sr., and Patricia A. BesseCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Timothy Pollard, Jarvis MacK and Robert Davenport, and Robert Booker, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. Eugene Johnson, Also Known as GenoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. United States v. Theodore (Ted) BerkeyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. United States v. Vern ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. United States v. Bee TylerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Christopher A. BurnsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API