Legal Opinion
Groff v. Commonwealth
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 29, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1915 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
Daniel M. Groff, who represents himself, has appealed from an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County upholding the suspension by the Pennsylvania Department of Transportation (DOT) of his operator’s license for failure to respond to a citation to appear before a court for violation of the Vehicle Code. See 75 Pa. C. S. §1533.
A judge of the common pleas court scheduled a hearing at which we are told counsel for DOT moved to quash Groff’s appeal as untimely. In support of the motion, DOT offered into evidence a copy of a notice of suspension addressed to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Schmidt v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Hanna v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Bureau of Traffic Safety v. ForteCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SuchkoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- City of Pittsburgh v. Open Doors for the HandicappedCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Trinkle Sales & Service v. PennDOT, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Carbon County1988
- Warenczuk v. PennDOT, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1991