Legal Opinion

Sterling Optical Co. v. University of New York

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 29, 1968PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. Waldron Herzberg, J.

Plaintiffs have filed a proposed judgment and bill of costs and move pursuant to OPLR 8303 (subd. [a], par. 2) for an order granting them an additional allowance of $3,000 to be taxed as costs on tbe ground that this case was difficult or extraordinary.

Tbe extraordinary nature of this case, its obvious difficulties, and tbe amount of time and expense necessarily expended in its preparation, apparent from a reading of the voluminous record, convince me that plaintiffs are entitled to an additional allowance. (See 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 8303.02.)

In addition I find that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ziankoski v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  2. Thompson v. T.F.M. Associates Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
  3. Clickner v. ShanleyNew York Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API