Sterling Optical Co. v. University of New York
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtR. Waldron Herzberg, J.
Plaintiffs have filed a proposed judgment and bill of costs and move pursuant to OPLR 8303 (subd. [a], par. 2) for an order granting them an additional allowance of $3,000 to be taxed as costs on tbe ground that this case was difficult or extraordinary.
Tbe extraordinary nature of this case, its obvious difficulties, and tbe amount of time and expense necessarily expended in its preparation, apparent from a reading of the voluminous record, convince me that plaintiffs are entitled to an additional allowance. (See 8 Weinstein-Korn-Miller, N. Y. Civ. Prac., par. 8303.02.)
In addition I find that…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Ziankoski v. SimmonsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Thompson v. T.F.M. Associates Inc.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1975
- Clickner v. ShanleyNew York Supreme Court · 1988