Legal Opinion

Whatley v. THE ALTO CORPORATION

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided July 12, 1955No. 18992, 18998PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

Counsel for the petitioner contend in their brief filed in this court that: (1) the assignment was valid and legal in form and substance; (2) it was supported by a lawful consideration; (3) it was timely made; and (4) the parties attacking the assignment are general open-account creditors of the assignor, and the provisions of the contract under which the attack was made do not confer any rights upon them. Counsel for the other claimants admit the first three contentions above stated, but assert that the assignment conferred no greater right upon the assignee than the assignor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Green v. Farrar Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Prince v. Neal-Millard Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Tuck v. Moss Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  4. Conway v. CaswellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Smith v. FolsomSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Browning v. Gaster Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. Mayer Electric Supply Co. v. Federal InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Gunby v. HarperSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
  4. Gaster Lumber Co. v. BrowningCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. Bennett v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API