Legal Opinion

Butler v. Haight

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1832PublishedCited by 5 opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, tried at the Livingston circuit in'October, 1829, before the Hon. Addison Gardiner, one of the circuit judges.

Read the full summary

This was an action of assumpsit, tried at the Livingston circuit in'October, 1829, before the Hon. Addison Gardiner, one of the circuit judges. On the 24th October, 1828, the defendant purchased of the plaintiff cabinet furniture to the amount of $161,51, and gave him three notes, one signed by R. McNaughton and others for $65, bearing date in March, 1827, payable to the defendant or bearer in two years after date, for value received; the second, signed by J. Dart, for $66,56, bearing date in October, 1828, payable to the defendant or bearer on 1st June, 1829, for value received; and the…

1Opinion of the CourtBy the Court Sutherland, J.

I perceive no legal objection to the plaintiff’s recovery in this case, either upon the count for goods sold and delivered, or under the common money counts.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pharr v. BachelorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  2. Monroe v. HoffNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Combs v. BatemanNew York Supreme Court · 1850
  4. Williams v. KetchumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Soffe v. GallagherNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1854

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API