Legal Opinion

Curtis v. McCardel

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 6, 1953PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

In determining this controversy we are obliged _ to consider and interpret in the light of the facts, the provisions of the Mechanic’s Lien Law, F.S.A. § 84.01 et seq., for cautionary notices, affidavits to be furnished by general contractors at the conclusion of work, and final payments.

A contractor undertook to construct a motel for the appellants for the sum of $26,-000. Their agreement was reduced to writing. The total cost appeared in the instrument, but the spaces intended for insertion of dates and amounts of periodic payments were left blank. Appended to the instrument…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. Del-Mar Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1953

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Broderick v. Overhead Door Co. of Fort Lauderdale, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  2. All State Pipe Supply Co. v. McNairSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Renuart Lumber Yards, Inc. v. StearnSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  4. Ward v. Miami Lock & Hardware Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  5. Beam v. Jerome Lumber & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API