Legal Opinion
United States v. 6.45 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 29, 2005No. 03-2305PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
AMBRO, Circuit Judge.
The United States appeals from the District Court’s judgment awarding compensation to Overview Limited Partnership (“Overview”) and Hans and Christina Eng-gren (the “Enggrens”) pursuant to the Government’s taking of 6.45 acres of land in the Gettysburg National Military Park. The Government asserts that the District Court impermissibly failed to apply the “unit rule” of valuation in determining the fair market value of the condemned land (instead valuing separate interests rather than the aggregate interests as a single unit). Moreover, the Government…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Boom Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kirby Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Whitehouse Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Faith Temple Church v. Town of BrightonDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- United States v. 6.45 Acres Of LandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- City of Milwaukee Post No. 2874 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States v. Redevelopment Authority of the City of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.