Jordan v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
This appeal raises the question whether the statutory designation of the New Jersey Horsemen’s Benevolent and Protective Association (NJHBPA) to receive up to 2.5% of the purse money from thoroughbred horseraeing in New Jersey violates state constitutional prohibitions against special laws. The Chancery Division concluded that the special law provisions of the New Jersey Constitution had not been violated. We granted direct certification, 88 N.J. 500 (1981), and now modify and affirm.
I
Plaintiffs are owners of thoroughbred racehorses that run…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Harvey v. Essex County Board of FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Gangemi v. BerrySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce v. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
- State v. ProfaciSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
- New Jersey State Parole Board v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Matter of Ass'n of Trial Lawyers of Am.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
- Brown v. Township of Old BridgeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
- Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Atlantic City Racing Ass'nSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.