Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Perugini
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 8, 2004No. AC 23752PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HENNESSY, J.
The plaintiff, Robert F. Carroll, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the defendant, Michael Perugini, in this breach of contract action. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that he (1) was in breach of the contract and (2) failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the defendant’s construction work breached the implied warranty that the work would be completed in a good and workmanlike manner or that it was negligently performed. We dis*338agree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
In…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Martin v. KavanewskySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Lipshie v. George M. Taylor & Son, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Wilson v. Kapetan, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Williams v. Campanaro Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Torgerson v. KennyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Lewis v. Frazao Building Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Borrelli v. H AND H CONTRACTING, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Solairaj v. Mannarino Builders, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016