Ronwin v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman
Plaintiff, Edward Ronwin, appeals from the dismissal of his complaint against defendants Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. (hereinafter Piper), George C. McKann, Paul M. Steinbrink, Paul W. Fairchild (hereinafter the panel or the arbitrators), and the New York Stock Exchange (hereinafter N.Y.S.E.).
Ronwin, who possessed a juris doctorate in law and an advanced degree in biochemistry, attributed his substantial losses in the com-modifies market to Piper. He and Piper agreed to submit his claim to arbitration. After a lengthy hearing, conducted under the auspices of the N.Y.S.E., Ronwin’s claim was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- Garver v. FergusonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Board of Trustees v. Cook County College Teachers Union, Local 1600Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Patterson v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
- National Acceptance Co. of America v. Pintura Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Kalish v. Illinois Education AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- People v. TillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Braun/Skiba, Ltd. v. Orchard PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Stoller v. StollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.