Legal Opinion

Ronwin v. Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 29, 1983No. 82-1588PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hartman

Plaintiff, Edward Ronwin, appeals from the dismissal of his complaint against defendants Piper, Jaffray & Hopwood, Inc. (hereinafter Piper), George C. McKann, Paul M. Steinbrink, Paul W. Fairchild (hereinafter the panel or the arbitrators), and the New York Stock Exchange (hereinafter N.Y.S.E.).

Ronwin, who possessed a juris doctorate in law and an advanced degree in biochemistry, attributed his substantial losses in the com-modifies market to Piper. He and Piper agreed to submit his claim to arbitration. After a lengthy hearing, conducted under the auspices of the N.Y.S.E., Ronwin’s claim was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burchell v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
  2. Garver v. FergusonIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Board of Trustees v. Cook County College Teachers Union, Local 1600Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Patterson v. Northern Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. National Acceptance Co. of America v. Pintura Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mason v. SnyderAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  2. Kalish v. Illinois Education AssociationAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. People v. TillerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Braun/Skiba, Ltd. v. Orchard PartnershipAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Stoller v. StollerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API