Legal Opinion · Dissent
Gooden v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided May 10, 2001No. CR 00-845Published
1DissentTom Glaze, Justice
We denied Mr. McKissic’s prior request to withdraw as counsel in a per curiam on March 22, 2001. See Gooden v. State, 344 Ark. 291, 40 S.W.3d 271 (2001). Nothing has changed to my knowledge except that Gooden now wants to proceed in forma pauperis. I would grant Gooden’s motion and appoint McKissic as counsel.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gooden v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001