Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

State v. . Cardwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partClark, C. J.

The defendant was convicted upon the charge of unlawfully selling spirituous liquors to O. C. Sharp, who was the only witness for the State, and testified as follows: That he knew Jeff Cardwell, and that he lives in Reidsville. That he had a transaction with Jeff Cardwell relative to whiskey. That he went to him and asked him if he would get him a gallon of whiskey. He said he would, and witness told him the kind he wanted, and said he wanted Turkey Mountain Corn, and gave him the price of the whiskey, $2.25. He got the whiskey through the Southern Express Company's office six or seven hours…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. . WhisenantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  2. State v. . BurchfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. DavisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API