Legal Opinion · Dissent

Agency for Investigation & Detection, Inc. v. Department of State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 26, 1966Published

1Dissent

McNally, J.:

I dissent, in part. This appears to be a case of first impression. Petitioner relied on the opinion of the Attorney-General (1928 Atty. Gen. 155, 156). The fact that the raid of the complainant’s apartment disclosed evidence against the male occupant should not serve to aggravate the punishment. The eon-duet complained of would warrant disciplinary action and should be discouraged. However, in view of the fact that it has been indulged in for a long time without any regulatory action, the change in policy should be accompanied by understanding. A warning or a modest fine would be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Agency for Investigation & Detection, Inc. v. Department of StateNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API