Legal Opinion
People v. Daniels
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 11, 1994No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed and matter remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject defendant’s contention that photographic arrays were unduly suggestive because defendant was the only person whose photograph appeared in both arrays. "Multiple photo identification procedures are not inherently suggestive” (People v Chapman, 161 AD2d 1156, Iv denied 76 NY2d 854; see also, People v Cordilione, 159 AD2d 864, Iv denied 76 NY2d 786; People v Sheirod, 124 AD2d 14, 18-19, Iv denied 70 NY2d 656).…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. SheirodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- People v. CordilioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. ChapmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. GreenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. QuinonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. DunlapAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- People v. MolsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.